“In America, the President reigns for
four years, and journalism governs for ever and ever.”
– Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism (1891).
– Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism (1891).
After weeks of
looking at different ways that journalism can be used to manipulate reality and
churn out shocking, meaningless half-truths, we come at last to the noble and
sophisticated end of the journalistic profession – investigative journalism.
Ross Coulthart
argues that all good journalism involves “questioning investigation of facts
and opinions presented to us.” This ‘good’ side to journalism is now a rare art
form, and a profession that has sadly suffered throughout the transition into
the new media. Nonetheless, it is still practiced in news media institutions
that can afford such luxuries, and its role in a democracy is still as
important as ever.
So how can we spot
this sophisticated and prudent form of journalism amongst the hordes of vulgar,
ignoble churnalists that make up today’s largely-commercial media landscape? Dr Redman characterises
investigative journalism according to the five “ins”; intelligent, informed,
intuitive, inside and an investment (of the journalists’ blood, sweat, money,
time and tears) – all for the pursuit of truth. The five “ins”
essentially mean that the investigative breed of journalists become part of the
story they are reporting through substantive investigation and the consultation
of sources. In this way, investigative journalism is both critical and
thorough.
Perhaps the most
defining feature of investigative journalism is that it is focused on public
interest, not tainted by the majority of the media’s news values. As a result,
it is generally associated with topics regarding social justice. Due to this,
investigative journalism has a adopted a role in modern democracy as the
‘fourth estate’ – an institution above society, the state and the capital,
holding the latter two to account and exposing hidden truths.
While this role as the ‘custodians of concience’ (Ettema and Glasser) seems romantic and imagined, it is evidenced in The Moonlight State, an investigation by Four Corners in 1987 which resulted in the exposure of mass-corruption in the Queensland police force and the consequent retirement of the chief commissioner. The Moonlight State was largely a result of the efforts of Chris Masters, Phil Dickie and Shaun Hoyt.
Sadly, though,
investigative journalism has suffered throughout the transition into the new
media. Naturally this long-form journalism involves a huge commitment in terms
of time and money. These are two things that newspapers no longer have, and two
things that commercial television stations have no intention of giving up for
the sake of social justice. Sir Harold
Evans, former editor of the The Sunday
Times in the UK, explained the situation in an interview last year:
Thankfully,
there is hope yet for investigative journalism. Firstly, websites like www.theglobalmail.org see the decline in investigative
journalism as a hole in the market for an educated audience, reviving the
profession. Secondly, institutions like
the ABC will continue to be reserves for the endangered investigative reporter
thanks to their own legislation:
“The ABC cannot simply report; its
legislation clearly implies that it should also work within the best traditions
of investigative journalism … systematically to pursue issues of public concern
through innovative and reliable journalism…” (ABC, 1985).
The last custodians of Conscience: shows
like Four Corners and the
youth-focused Hungry Beast continue
to deliver thorough investigations, ensuring at least some of the fourth state
remains intact and active.
While
investigative journalism has taken a big hit with the recent dramatic changes
in the media landscape, it is still active and as powerful as ever. So long as
there is a viable market and the public media to protect it, investigative
journalism will continue to expose the truth and hold the separate three
estates to account.
No comments:
Post a Comment