It cannot be
denied that the commercial media dominates Australian Television, Radio and
Newspapers. Surely this is a good thing; instead of having a government dictate
the information that reaches the general public, like in so many countries,
private companies can broadcast whatever they want (within reason). The
non-governmental media organisations that arose with the intention of gaining
profit – the commercial media – was the focus of this week’s lecture. We looked
at its form , its function and its flaws.
In
Australia, the biggest players in the business of newspapers are Fairfax Media,
News Limited and APN. Regarding television, channels Seven and Nine compete for
views from the general public, while Ten takes an adolescent angle. The largest
two radio corporations are ARN and Austerio .
The private media’s form is based on subscription and sponsorship; its function, of course, is commercial. Dr. Redman made the point that advertisers are the true customers of commercial media, not readers, viewers or listeners. So if we’re not customers than what are we? Because we are not paying for a service (in the case of free to air TV), it is reasonable to assume that we are in face the products being sold:
As an aside, I
found it rather ironic that the commercial media’s alternate function is the
production of propaganda. In a strange turn of events, the public media is more
balanced (regarding political matters) than the ‘free’ commercial media. I
found this quite interesting.
It is worth
mentioning commercial media’s eternal struggle – to generate profit while
delivering quality material (‘public trust’). The question is, what do the
media corporations care about more? I don’t mean to sound depressing but I
think we all know the answer to that question. Sadly, I think John McManus hit
the nail on the head; “profit over-rides social responsibility.” It is apparent
that the ethical wall separating the free media’s commercial and social
functions (analogous to the segregation of church and state) has indeed been
compromised.
Here’s a
selection of the commercial television shows being broadcasted on the evening I
wrote this blog: The 7pm Project (technically now ‘The Project’ due to an
unfortunate re-scheduling), ‘World’s Strictest Parents’ and ‘The Biggest
Loser.’ Clearly today provided little intelligence.
Surely our society is not reflected in such superficial glib. Sadly, mouse
clicks reveal all. The data shows that celebrity shenanigans, UFO sightings and
movie stars without makeup are what draws the most attention. Websites compete
for views, and as such the result is tabloidisation and a ‘dumbed-down’ online
media.
Broadcast media
is also starting to show signs of tabloidization. Advertising revenue for
broadcast media has quickly declined. This means less revenue and consequently
less money for quality production, more affordable foreign imports and more
programs that grab viewer attention as quickly as possible. Does this mean that there will be no escape
from low-quality, attention-grabbing media output both online and on
television?
It’s not all
doom and gloom. Sites like theglobalmail.org aim to stand out and draw in readers
with quality rather than tabloid style attention-grabbing techniques. Furthermore,
public news corporations such as the ABC are not for profit and consequently do
not have an ethical wall dilemma to deal with. Or at least that is what can be assumed.
We will just have to wait until next week to see.
No comments:
Post a Comment